1. Implement a TaPoS assert operation predicate that offers full block ID
validation for transactions that want the added security. This is only
required for transactions that are of high value and transfer control of
funds to a newly created identifier and where the witnesses cannot be
trusted.
2. Remove the full block ID from the transaction digest generation.
- remove circular dependency with fee_schedule
- unitiy build db_* as database.cpp
- move protocol definitions in separate directory
- combined some objects/evaluators
- combined limit/call evaluator/objects into market_evaluator.*
Reasons:
1. The protocol should not depend upon implementation details such as
how the database objects are structured or reflected
2. The protocol should deal in abstract concepts
3. Should use fc::datastream rather than istringstream for performance
and memory allocation reasons
4. Fees should be charged proportional to the size of the operation
5. Validate on the assert operation should also perform sanity checks
on types
6. Protocol definition objects should never depend upon the database
because they may be used in situations where the database and
evaluators are not present.
7. Reflected field names should never have '_' in them because they
become part of the *PUBLIC* json definition.